My Distro Search Ended with Fedora 44 and GNOME 50

RAM prices are climbing everywhere these days; you have probably noticed it yourself. That piece of hardware has become more valuable, both in the market and in my personal and work life.

That rising value had started to bother me more while using Windows. My laptop has 16 GB of RAM, and Windows was consuming more than half of it while I was doing nothing at all. No matter how cleanly I kept the system, I still ran into occasional freezes and slowdowns whenever I actually tried to do something.

Song for this post

I had used Arch Linux before, went back to Windows for a while, and then left it again. So I went looking for a Linux distribution once more. What I needed was a system that was stable, fast, secure, easy, and controllable. I want to put “easy” and “controllable” in quotes here, because that distinction matters a great deal to me.

At this point, many of you are probably thinking of Arch Linux, CachyOS, Debian, and similar distributions. Some of you might even say something like: just install this or that distro and enjoy it.

But after 14 or 15 years, maybe longer, of being deep in computers, I have switched distributions more times than I would like to admit. I had not found a system that fit the “ease” and “control” I described above nearly as well as this one.

Looking back at every distribution I have tried, not integrating Fedora into my personal and work life sooner was a genuine waste of time.

Picture a distribution backed by one of the largest open source companies in the world, yet not steered solely by that one company’s interests. It brings together community contribution, corporate support, and open source culture in a single project.

And it manages to combine two ideas that rarely sit well together in technology, innovation, and stability, in a system that is entirely free. That distribution is Fedora.

Fedora does not stop there, either. It also builds and ships tailored systems for other areas, such as Server, Cloud, CoreOS, and IoT.

All of this is the work of an enormous community and team, and they deserve real thanks for it. If you are in a position to support them, I would recommend it. Providing something this powerful and free, and contributing to the progress of technology at that scale, deserves more than a passing compliment.

Now I can talk about the GNOME desktop environment.

Mentioning GNOME to Linux users can bring out a bit of fatigue and irritation. I understand the reaction, but the old GNOME is gone.

Thankfully, GNOME’s transition from X11 to Wayland reached a real milestone with GNOME 50. GNOME’s own X11 session has been removed entirely. Older X11 applications still run through XWayland.

Some of you might be wondering what X11, XWayland, and Wayland actually are.

X11 and Wayland are two different display server systems. XWayland is the compatibility layer that lets X11 applications run under Wayland.

And then there is the obvious follow-up: what is a compositor? Let me explain.

A compositor is the software that combines the windows and other visual elements drawn by applications into the final image you see on screen. On GNOME, that job belongs to Mutter. Mutter used to manage GNOME’s X11 session as well, but Wayland now forms the foundation of the desktop.

X11 had grown old and heavy over time, and GNOME inherited a fair share of the problems that came with it, problems we felt as end users.

The Wayland transition is what actually rescued GNOME here. Compared to the old GNOME, the freezes, window glitches, and odd rendering issues are much rarer now. At least, I no longer run into them. Applications, animations, and the desktop as a whole feel noticeably smoother than before.

GNOME 50 does not improve this experience only by dropping the X11 session. Improvements to variable refresh rate and fractional scaling deliver a smoother experience, particularly on high refresh rate or high resolution displays.

Files also loads thumbnails and icons faster now, uses less memory, and picks up various stability fixes. None of this looks revolutionary on its own, but GNOME 50 improves plenty of things you actually notice in daily use.

If past complaints like these pushed you toward a different desktop environment, it is worth reconsidering now. The “ease” I mentioned about Fedora comes partly from this.

GNOME does not throw a cluttered desktop at you that tries to show everything at once. Instead, it offers something simple, clear, and organized. As a daily GNOME user, I am genuinely happy with application search, virtual workspaces, and window switching. After a while, it is hard to give that comfort up.

Of course, this simplicity will not suit everyone. Users who want to reshape every corner of their desktop may find GNOME too restrictive at times. But the ease I am describing here is not about being able to change everything; it comes from the system giving you a sound, usable setup from the start.

Fedora’s “control” side shows up right here as well. The system does not force you to spend hours configuring it after installation, but when you need to, it lets you fine-tune packages, services, security policies, and system components in detail.

We are close to the end of the post now, so let me mention a few more details before I forget.

The DNF5 package manager that Fedora 44 ships with is easy and practical. Installing, removing, updating, and searching packages all take just a few simple commands.

For example, to install an application:

sudo dnf install package-name

To update the system:

sudo dnf upgrade

To remove a package:

sudo dnf remove package-name

You do not have to touch the terminal for daily use, of course. You can install applications, track system updates, and manage Flatpak apps through GNOME Software.

That said, I do not recommend installing everything through Flatpak and GNOME Software. As you may already know, applications packaged through systems like Snap and Flatpak run inside a sandbox. That is a real security advantage, but it also limits how an application can interact with the rest of the system through permissions. Sometimes that limitation matters quite a bit. So for applications that need deeper system integration, I prefer Fedora’s own RPM packages when I can.

On top of that, Fedora has a real advantage on the security side. SELinux is enabled by default. It restricts which areas applications and services are allowed to access. As end users we rarely notice it is even there, but it provides a serious security layer in the background.

Fedora is also a fairly current distribution. New technologies developed in the Linux world often reach end users through Fedora first. Wayland, PipeWire, Btrfs, and several other technologies were adopted by Fedora quite early.

That said, there is a common misunderstanding worth correcting here. Being current does not make Fedora unstable or prone to breaking. It is also not a rolling release like Arch Linux, constantly updating. It ships in defined releases, and those releases go through a testing process.

I am not claiming Fedora is flawless, but I do think it is a solid, well-balanced system for today’s needs.

Some proprietary drivers, media codecs, and patented software may need to be installed separately after the initial setup. RPM Fusion handles that, and that is exactly what I did. You can install and use the proprietary NVIDIA driver without any real trouble.

In short, the system does not bury you in unnecessary detail or force you to set up everything yourself, but it never gets in your way when you actually want to take control.

This is exactly where the “ease” and “control” I mentioned at the start of this post meet.

Fedora does not take control away from the user to be easy. It does not make the system unnecessarily complicated to be controllable, either.

That is exactly the balance I had been looking for.

Fedora 44 and GNOME 50 together strike this balance better than any system I have used so far, and I expect that to keep being true. Everyone’s needs and workflow differ, of course, but if you do not want to fall behind on current technology and you do not want your computer to turn into a project that constantly needs fixing, I would recommend giving Fedora a chance.

Maybe it is exactly what you have been looking for too.

If you are new to Linux, or you want to get the basics down before switching to Fedora, I would also recommend an earlier post of mine, Getting Started with Linux: The Basics for Beginners. It covers what you will need at the start in more detail, from choosing a distribution to using the terminal, and from the file system to permissions and package management.

References